linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: remove redundant assignment to variable x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200416083427.GK1163@kadam>
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:34:28 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>, kbuild@...ts.01.org,
        lkp@...el.com, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: remove redundant assignment to variable x

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:07:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > I'd post a revert, but I don't seem to see an upstream commit for this
> > this to revert against. What's the revert policy in these cases? Or can
> > the patch be just ignored by the maintainers so it's not applied?
> 
> It has not been applied, and will be ignored, in part thanks to the
> report.
> 
> However I think Dan's report is misleading in that it looks like it's
> about a commit while I think it should emphasize that it's a pre-merge
> report on the patch on the mailing list.
> 

To be honest, these are auto-generated by the kbuild bot and I was a bit
confused myself.

regards,
dan carpenter