[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZPZ4nFQ6B3tGG9wvceoTWqAkfY0r1UKs2pf_c=ZNBG=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:20:38 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] gpio: add a reusable generic gpio_chip using regmap
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:57 PM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
> So what about the following:
>
> #define GPIO_REGMAP_ADDR_ZERO (unsigned int)(-1)
Yeah with regmap explicitly using int I guess we can't use
S32_MAX, so that is fair.
> So this way the user might assign the base addresses the normal way
> except when he wants to use zero, in that case he has to use
>
> ->base_adr = GPIO_REGMAP_ADDR_ZERO;
>
> gpio-regmap.c could use then:
>
> if (base_addr)
> something_useful(gpio_regmap_addr(base_addr));
>
> unsigned int gpio_regmap_addr(unsigned int addr)
> {
> return (addr == GPIO_REGMAP_ADDR_ZERO) ? 0 : addr;
> }
That's reasonably clean.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists