linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] drivers: hv: remove redundant assignment to pointer primary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:02:54 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drivers: hv: remove redundant assignment to
 pointer primary_channel

We have this discussion over and over.  I always say it helps to have
the commit mentioned in the commit message but it's not a Fixes tag.
So I think that the commit message should say something like
"commit 1234234 ("blah blah") removed some code so this variable isn't
used any more".  I think it helps the review process.  But then if we
mention the commit everyone says to use the Fixes tag.

It turns out if you leave out the commit entirely then people still
complain but a lot less frequently.  It shouldn't work that way but
reviewers are illogical.

regards,
dan carpenter