linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sched: Streamline select_task_rq() & select_task_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:00:56 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sched: Streamline select_task_rq() &
 select_task_rq_fair()

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:58:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:05:03PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Valentin Schneider (9):
> >   sched/fair: find_idlest_group(): Remove unused sd_flag parameter
> >   sched/debug: Make sd->flags sysctl read-only
> >   sched: Remove checks against SD_LOAD_BALANCE
> >   sched/topology: Kill SD_LOAD_BALANCE
> >   sched: Add WF_TTWU, WF_EXEC wakeup flags
> 
> How about I queue two first 5, and you rework these last few?

Argh, 4 ofcourse, that 5th patch doesn't make much sense if we have to
rework those flags like I proposed.

> >   sched: Kill select_task_rq()'s sd_flag parameter
> >   sched/fair: Dissociate wakeup decisions from SD flag value
> >   sched/fair: Split select_task_rq_fair want_affine logic
> >   sched/topology: Define and use shortcut pointers for wakeup sd_flag scan
> 
>