[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4843f690-7071-aa4f-cc9d-d9cc2321e669@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:00:46 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
maz@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
suzuki.poulose@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Optimize kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run function
On 2020/4/15 22:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 15/04/20 11:07, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> In case this is no longer needed I'd suggest we drop 'kvm_run' parameter
>> and extract it from 'struct kvm_vcpu' when needed. This looks like a
>> natural add-on to your cleanup patch.
>
> I agree, though I think it should be _instead_ of Tianjia's patch rather
> than on top.
>
> Paolo
>
Thank you very much for the comments of Vitaly and Paolo, I will make a
v2 patch.
Thanks and best,
Tianjia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists