[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a14Vk1JKRYZkkAhC9fAV4CMQzvux_FWdNkn39OwsYn4mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:06:55 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Sort vendor-specific errata
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:57 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
>
> Sort configuration options for vendor-specific errata by vendor, to
> increase uniformity.
> Move ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI up, as it is also selected by
> ARM64_ERRATUM_1286807.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Looks fine to me, though I wonder if we should move the errata
menu to a separate Kconfig file, given that it's already longer than the
Kconfig.platforms and Kconfig.debug files at 500 lines.
Maybe a Kconfig.cpu with both the "ARMv8.x architectural features" and
errata menus?
Either way,
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de
Powered by blists - more mailing lists