[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200417201212.GH785713@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 22:12:12 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: add Broadcom BCM54140 support
> > Hi Michael
> >
> > How much flexibility is there in setting the base address using
> > strapping etc? Is it limited to a multiple of 4?
>
> You can just set the base address to any address. Then the following
> addresses are used:
> base, base + 1, base + 2, base + 3, (base + 4)*
O.K, nothing as nice as base = my MOD 4.
:-(
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists