linux-kernel - Re: remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87r1wl68gf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:41:52 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2

Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and
> coredump code.  Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are
> those to the spufs coredump code.
>
> Changes since v1:
>  - properly spell NUL
>  - properly handle the compat siginfo case in ELF coredumps

Quick question is exec from a kernel thread within the scope of what you
are looking at?

There is a set_fs(USER_DS) in flush_old_exec whose sole purpose appears
to be to allow exec from kernel threads.  Where the kernel threads
run with set_fs(KERNEL_DS) until they call exec.

Eric