lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:41:52 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2

Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and
> coredump code.  Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are
> those to the spufs coredump code.
>
> Changes since v1:
>  - properly spell NUL
>  - properly handle the compat siginfo case in ELF coredumps

Quick question is exec from a kernel thread within the scope of what you
are looking at?

There is a set_fs(USER_DS) in flush_old_exec whose sole purpose appears
to be to allow exec from kernel threads.  Where the kernel threads
run with set_fs(KERNEL_DS) until they call exec.

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ