[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1587112169.12875.2.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:29:29 +0800
From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@...iatek.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"Kate Stewart" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
"Josef Friedl" <josef.friedl@...ed.at>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/6] rtc: mt6397: Add support for the MediaTek
MT6358 RTC
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 10:14 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
>
> > From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@...iatek.com>
> >
> > This add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC. Driver using
> > compatible data to store different RTC_WRTGR address offset.
> > This replace RTC_WRTGR to RTC_WRTGR_MT6323 in mt6323-poweroff
> > driver which only needed by armv7 CPU without ATF.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> > Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
>
> Please place these in chronological order. They should provide some
> history, rather than a unordered slab list of random sign-offs.
>
I suppose that you mean the order should be like below, right?
Reviewed-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> > include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 9 ++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > index 7dfb63b..6200f3b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
> > #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY BIT(6)
> > #define RTC_BBPU_KEY (0x43 << 8)
> >
> > -#define RTC_WRTGR 0x003c
> > +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6358 0x3a
> > +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6397 0x3c
>
> Why remove the leading 00's?
>
> These are now different to the other regs defined in this header.
>
I will fix this at next patch.
> > +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6323 RTC_WRTGR_MT6397
> >
> > #define RTC_IRQ_STA 0x0002
>
> Like here for instance --^
>
> > #define RTC_IRQ_STA_AL BIT(0)
> > @@ -65,6 +67,10 @@
> > #define MTK_RTC_POLL_DELAY_US 10
> > #define MTK_RTC_POLL_TIMEOUT (jiffies_to_usecs(HZ))
> >
> > +struct mtk_rtc_data {
> > + u32 wrtgr;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mt6397_rtc {
> > struct device *dev;
> > struct rtc_device *rtc_dev;
> > @@ -74,6 +80,7 @@ struct mt6397_rtc {
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > int irq;
> > u32 addr_base;
> > + const struct mtk_rtc_data *data;
> > };
> >
> > #endif /* _LINUX_MFD_MT6397_RTC_H_ */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists