[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMzwqFaaA-zQh0Nv4SUdoJUFO_yTmTjfbMFqyxBea1U+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:23:05 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] kcsan: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 04:56, Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Good catch, thank you!
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/kcsan/debugfs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/debugfs.c b/kernel/kcsan/debugfs.c
> index 1a08664a7fab..023e49c58d55 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/debugfs.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/debugfs.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static ssize_t insert_report_filterlist(const char *func)
> /* initial allocation */
> report_filterlist.addrs =
> kmalloc_array(report_filterlist.size,
> - sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (report_filterlist.addrs == NULL) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static ssize_t insert_report_filterlist(const char *func)
> size_t new_size = report_filterlist.size * 2;
> unsigned long *new_addrs =
> krealloc(report_filterlist.addrs,
> - new_size * sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + new_size * sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> if (new_addrs == NULL) {
> /* leave filterlist itself untouched */
>
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists