[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d314bc3-ea59-684d-2d34-20b152a36f4f@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:25:38 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2
On 4/15/20 11:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
> documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
> spread over the callers into the core API.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - drop a few patches
> - fix a comment typo
> - cover the newly merged use_mm/unuse_mm caller in vfio
You can add my reviewed-by/tested-by to the patches, passes the
io_uring regression tests.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists