[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2403add7-d468-7615-22c5-3fafb1264d54@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 22:39:59 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com,
khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, willy@...radead.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
swkhack <swkhack@...il.com>,
"Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock
在 2020/4/16 下午11:28, Johannes Weiner 写道:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 04:01:20PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2020/4/15 下午9:42, Alex Shi 写道:
>>> Hi Johannes,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for point out!
>>>
>>> Charging in __read_swap_cache_async would ask for 3 layers function arguments
>>> pass, that would be a bit ugly. Compare to this, could we move out the
>>> lru_cache add after commit_charge, like ksm copied pages?
>>>
>>> That give a bit extra non lru list time, but the page just only be used only
>>> after add_anon_rmap setting. Could it cause troubles?
>>
>> Hi Johannes & Andrew,
>>
>> Doing lru_cache_add_anon during swapin_readahead can give a very short timing
>> for possible page reclaiming for these few pages.
>>
>> If we delay these few pages lru adding till after the vm_fault target page
>> get memcg charging(mem_cgroup_commit_charge) and activate, we could skip the
>> mem_cgroup_try_charge/commit_charge/cancel_charge process in __read_swap_cache_async().
>> But the cost is maximum SWAP_RA_ORDER_CEILING number pages on each cpu miss
>> page reclaiming in a short time. On the other hand, save the target vm_fault
>> page from reclaiming before activate it during that time.
>
> The readahead pages surrounding the faulting page might never get
> accessed and pile up to large amounts. Users can also trigger
> non-faulting readahead with MADV_WILLNEED.
>
> So unfortunately, I don't see a way to keep these pages off the
> LRU. They do need to be reclaimable, or they become a DoS vector.
>
> I'm currently preparing a small patch series to make swap ownership
> tracking an integral part of memcg and change the swapin charging
> sequence, then you don't have to worry about it. This will also
> unblock Joonsoo's "workingset protection/detection on the anonymous
> LRU list" patch series, since he is blocked on the same problem - he
> needs the correct LRU available at swapin time to process refaults
> correctly. Both of your patch series are already pretty large, they
> shouldn't need to also deal with that.
>
That sounds great!
BTW, the swapin target page will add into inactive_anon list and then activate
after chaged. that left a minum time slot for this page to be reclaimed.
May better activate it early?
Also I have 2 clean up patches, which may or may not useful for you. will send
it to you. :)
Thanks
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists