| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:13:58 -0700
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: mgorman@...e.de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, mina86@...a86.com,
riel@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaewon31.kim@...il.com,
ytk.lee@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: skip layzfree page on
reclaim_clean_pages_from_list
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 05:38:37PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Jaewon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:35:14PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> > This patch fix nr_isolate_* mismatch problem between cma and dirty
> > lazyfree page.
> >
> > If try_to_unmap_one is used for reclaim and it detects a dirty lazyfree
> > page, then the lazyfree page is changed to a normal anon page having
> > SwapBacked by commit 18863d3a3f59 ("mm: remove SWAP_DIRTY in ttu"). Even
> > with the change, reclaim context correctly counts isolated files because
> > it uses is_file_lru to distinguish file. And the change to anon is not
> > happened if try_to_unmap_one is used for migration. So migration context
> > like compaction also correctly counts isolated files even though it uses
> > page_is_file_lru insted of is_file_lru. Recently page_is_file_cache was
> > renamed to page_is_file_lru by commit 9de4f22a60f7 ("mm: code cleanup for
> > MADV_FREE").
> >
> > But the nr_isolate_* mismatch problem happens on cma alloc. There is
> > reclaim_clean_pages_from_list which is being used only by cma. It was
> > introduced by commit 02c6de8d757c ("mm: cma: discard clean pages during
> > contiguous allocation instead of migration") to reclaim clean file pages
> > without migration. The cma alloc uses both reclaim_clean_pages_from_list
> > and migrate_pages, and it uses page_is_file_lru to count isolated
> > files. If there are dirty lazyfree pages allocated from cma memory
> > region, the pages are counted as isolated file at the beginging but are
> > counted as isolated anon after finished.
> >
> > Mem-Info:
> > Node 0 active_anon:3045904kB inactive_anon:611448kB active_file:14892kB inactive_file:205636kB unevictable:10416kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):37664kB mapped:630216kB dirty:384kB writeback:0kB shmem:42576kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no
> >
> > Like log above, there was too much isolated file, 37664kB, which
> > triggers too_many_isolated in reclaim when there is no isolated file in
> > system wide. It could be reproducible by running two programs, doing
> > MADV_FREE, writing and doing cma alloc, respectively. Although isolated
> > anon is 0, I found that the internal value of isolated anon was the
> > negative value of isolated file.
> >
> > Fix this by skipping anon pages on reclaim_clean_pages_from_list. The
> > lazyfree page can be checked by both PageAnon(page) and
> > page_is_file_lru. But in this case, PageAnon is enough to skip all
> > anon pages.
> >
> > Reported-by: Yong-Taek Lee <ytk.lee@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
>
> Thanks for the investigation!
> The thing is MADV_FREEed page since supporting swapless could change
> his LRU status between reclaim.
>
> I am worry about voiding the optimization we have kept in CMA but
> also don't have good idea, either so I tend to agree with this.
>
> Let me Cc Johannes who might have better idea.
>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index b06868fc4926..9380a18eef5e 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1497,6 +1497,9 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
> > LIST_HEAD(clean_pages);
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, page_list, lru) {
> > + /* to avoid race with MADV_FREE anon page */
> > + if (PageAnon(page))
> > + continue;
> > if (page_is_file_lru(page) && !PageDirty(page) &&
> > !__PageMovable(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> > ClearPageActive(page);
> > --
> > 2.13.7
> >
Hi Jaewon,
How about this idea? I think it could solve the issue with keeping
CMA alloc latency optimization.
diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h
index 292485f3d24d..10cc932e209a 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmstat.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct reclaim_stat {
unsigned nr_activate[2];
unsigned nr_ref_keep;
unsigned nr_unmap_fail;
+ unsigned nr_lazyfree_fail;
};
enum writeback_stat_item {
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4c8a1cdccbba..b390f6094f2f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1296,11 +1296,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
*/
if (page_mapped(page)) {
enum ttu_flags flags = ttu_flags | TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
+ bool lazyfree = PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapBacked(page);
if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page)))
flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
+
if (!try_to_unmap(page, flags)) {
stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
+ if (lazyfree && PageSwapBacked(page))
+ stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
goto activate_locked;
}
}
@@ -1492,8 +1496,8 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
.may_unmap = 1,
};
- struct reclaim_stat dummy_stat;
- unsigned long ret;
+ struct reclaim_stat stat;
+ unsigned long reclaimed;
struct page *page, *next;
LIST_HEAD(clean_pages);
@@ -1505,11 +1509,21 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
}
}
- ret = shrink_page_list(&clean_pages, zone->zone_pgdat, &sc,
- TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS, &dummy_stat, true);
+ reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&clean_pages, zone->zone_pgdat, &sc,
+ TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS, &stat, true);
list_splice(&clean_pages, page_list);
- mod_node_page_state(zone->zone_pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, -ret);
- return ret;
+ mod_node_page_state(zone->zone_pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, -reclaimed);
+ /*
+ * Since lazyfree pages are isolated from file LRU from the beginning,
+ * they will rotate back to anonymous LRU in the end if it failed to
+ * discard so isolated count will be mismatched.
+ * Compensate the isolated count for both LRU lists.
+ */
+ mod_node_page_state(zone->zone_pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON,
+ stat->nr_lazyfree_fail);
+ mod_node_page_state(zone->zone_pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_FILE,
+ -stat->nr_lazyfree_fail);
+ return reclaimed;
}
/*
--
2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists