[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXM7SLqv_9wrkc=+gnv9bLLHBox3O4vvmgwPf1H2qLyL3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:19:42 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Grace Kao <grace.kao@...el.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Add missing spinlock usage in chv_gpio_irq_handler
[Regarding subject: this says v2 -- where's v1?]
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 8:07 PM Grace Kao <grace.kao@...el.com> wrote:
>
> According to Braswell NDA Specification Update (#557593),
> concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write
> instructions may be dropped. We have an established format for the
> commit references, i.e.
> cdca06e4e859 ("pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in
> byt_gpio_irq_handler")
>
Might deserve a Fixes tag and Cc stable:
Fixes: 0bd50d719b00 pinctrl: cherryview: prevent concurrent access to
GPIO controllers
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Grace Kao <grace.kao@...el.com>
Seems like you should at least give me the reporter credit, if not the
actual authorship, since I did in fact write this patch...
Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
And since I approve of my own patch:
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists