[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58eaa90a-9777-4abe-fbf7-229cc68a37aa@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:35:51 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <ohad@...ery.com>
CC: <elder@...aro.org>, <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops allocation from
rproc_alloc()
On 4/17/20 8:49 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 4/15/20 3:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> Make the rproc_ops allocation a function on its own in an effort
>> to clean up function rproc_alloc().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index 0bfa6998705d..a5a0ceb86b3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -2001,6 +2001,25 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct
>> rproc_ops *ops)
>> +{
>> + rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rproc->ops)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Default to ELF loader if no load function is specified */
>> + if (!rproc->ops->load) {
>> + rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments;
>> + rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table;
>> + rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table =
>> + rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table;
>> + rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check;
>
> So, the conditional check on sanity check is dropped and the callback
> switched here without the changelog reflecting anything why. You should
> just rebase this patch on top of Clement's patch [1] that removes the
> conditional flag, and also usage from the remoteproc platform drivers.
>
> regards
> Suman
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11462013/
Sorry, gave the wrong link, that was v1. This is the latest,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11466955/
>
>
>> + rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
>> * @dev: the underlying device
>> @@ -2040,8 +2059,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev,
>> const char *name,
>> if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
>> goto free_rproc;
>> - rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!rproc->ops)
>> + if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops))
>> goto free_firmware;
>> rproc->name = name;
>> @@ -2068,16 +2086,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev,
>> const char *name,
>> atomic_set(&rproc->power, 0);
>> - /* Default to ELF loader if no load function is specified */
>> - if (!rproc->ops->load) {
>> - rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments;
>> - rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table;
>> - rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table =
>> rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table;
>> - if (!rproc->ops->sanity_check)
>> - rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check;
>> - rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr;
>> - }
>> -
>> mutex_init(&rproc->lock);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rproc->carveouts);
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists