| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200417202653.00002500@maquefel.me>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 20:26:53 +0300
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Nikita Shubin <nshubin@...con.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set pc on start
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:01:22 -0600
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 23:40, <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mathieue,
> >
> > Hi Nikita,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:33:08PM +0300, nikita.shubin@...uefel.me
> > wrote:
> >
> > In case elf file interrupt vector is not supposed to be at OCRAM_S,
> > it is needed to write elf entry point to OCRAM_S + 0x4, to boot M4
> > firmware.
> >
> > Otherwise firmware located anywhere besides OCRAM_S won't boot.
> >
> > The firmware must set stack poiner as first instruction:
> >
> > Reset_Handler:
> > ldr sp, = __stack /* set stack pointer */
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <NShubin@...con.com>
> >
> >
> > The address in the SoB has to match what is found in the "From:"
> > field of the email header. Checkpatch is complaining about that,
> > something I would have expected to be fixed before sending this set
> > out.
> >
> > Noted and will be fixed.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 3e72b6f38d4b..bebc58d0f711
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> >
> > #define IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX 8
> >
> > +#define IMX_BOOT_PC 0x4
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure
> > * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> > @@ -85,6 +87,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg;
> > struct imx_rproc_mem mem[IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX];
> > struct clk *clk;
> > + void __iomem *bootreg;
> > };
> >
> > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx7d[] = {
> > @@ -162,11 +165,16 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc
> > *rproc) struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + /* write entry point to program counter */
> > + writel(rproc->bootaddr, priv->bootreg);
> >
> >
> > What happens on all the other IMX systems where this fix is not
> > needed? Will they continue to work properly?
> >
> > Yes, my bad, it is also needed for IMX6 (but even so i need to
> > study this topic more carefully), this should be applied
> > exclusively for imx7d for now, and if will be needed someone with
> > imx6 hardware to test on can extend this on imx6 also.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > +
> > ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg,
> > dcfg->src_mask, dcfg->src_start);
> > if (ret)
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable M4!\n");
> >
> > + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "Started from 0x%x\n", rproc->bootaddr);
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -182,6 +190,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> > if (ret)
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop M4!\n");
> >
> > + /* clear entry points */
> > + writel(0, priv->bootreg);
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc
> > *rproc, u64 da, int len) static const struct rproc_ops
> > imx_rproc_ops = { .start = imx_rproc_start,
> > .stop = imx_rproc_stop,
> > - .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
> > + .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
> > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> >
> >
> > How is this useful? Sure it will set rproc->bootaddr in
> > rproc_fw_boot() but what good does that do when it is invariably
> > set again in imx_rproc_start() ?
> >
> > The priv->bootreg is the address where we are writing Entry Point
> > and it is fixed, 0x04 address is translated to 0x00180004, so don't
> > quite understand you we are writing rproc->bootaddr into
> > priv->bootreg, not wiseversa.
> >
>
> What is your reason to set ops->get_boot_addr ? How does that help
> the work done in this patch?
The reason is the following :
remoteproc_core.c:
| rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
| rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
remoteproc_internal.h
| static inline
| u32 rproc_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware
*fw) | {
| if (rproc->ops->get_boot_addr)
| return rproc->ops->get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
|
| return 0;
| }
>
> >
> > };
> >
> > static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
> > @@ -360,6 +372,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev) goto err_put_rproc;
> > }
> >
> > + priv->bootreg = imx_rproc_da_to_va(rproc, IMX_BOOT_PC,
> > sizeof(u32)); +
> > /*
> > * clk for M4 block including memory. Should be
> > * enabled before .start for FW transfer.
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists