[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c796219ea79d87093409f2dd1d3bf8e4a157ed7.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:53:44 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Zzy Wysm <zzy@...wysm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] nfsd: fix empty-body warning in nfs4state.c
On Sat, 2020-04-18 at 14:45 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On Apr 18, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Fix gcc empty-body warning when -Wextra is used:
> >
> > ../fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:3898:3: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘else’ statement [-Wempty-body]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
> > Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> > Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
>
> I have a patch in my queue that addresses this particular warning,
> but your change works for me too.
>
> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>
> Unless Bruce objects.
>
>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-next-20200417.orig/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ linux-next-20200417/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/file.h>
> > #include <linux/fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/namei.h>
> > #include <linux/swap.h>
> > @@ -3895,7 +3896,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
> > copy_clid(new, conf);
> > gen_confirm(new, nn);
> > } else /* case 4 (new client) or cases 2, 3 (client reboot): */
> > - ;
> > + do_empty();
> > new->cl_minorversion = 0;
> > gen_callback(new, setclid, rqstp);
> > add_to_unconfirmed(new);
This empty else seems silly and could likely be better handled by
a comment above the first if, something like:
/* for now only handle case 1: probable callback update */
if (conf && same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &clverifier)) {
copy_clid(new, conf);
gen_confirm(new, nn);
}
with no else use.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists