lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 18 Apr 2020 21:19:26 +0100
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 32/50] sh: Add loglvl to show_trace()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level parameter to show_trace() as a preparation to introduce
show_stack_loglvl().

Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
 arch/sh/include/asm/processor_32.h |  2 +-
 arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c         | 10 +++++-----
 arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c        |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/processor_32.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/processor_32.h
index 0e0ecc0132e3..d44409413418 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/processor_32.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/processor_32.h
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static __inline__ void enable_fpu(void)
 #define thread_saved_pc(tsk)	(tsk->thread.pc)
 
 void show_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp,
-		struct pt_regs *regs);
+		struct pt_regs *regs, const char *loglvl);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DUMP_CODE
 void show_code(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 959064b90055..d488a47a1f0f 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -127,16 +127,16 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
 };
 
 void show_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp,
-		struct pt_regs *regs)
+		struct pt_regs *regs, const char *loglvl)
 {
 	if (regs && user_mode(regs))
 		return;
 
-	printk("\nCall trace:\n");
+	printk("%s\nCall trace:\n", loglvl);
 
-	unwind_stack(tsk, regs, sp, &print_trace_ops, "");
+	unwind_stack(tsk, regs, sp, &print_trace_ops, (void *)loglvl);
 
-	printk("\n");
+	printk("%s\n", loglvl);
 
 	if (!tsk)
 		tsk = current;
@@ -158,5 +158,5 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
 	stack = (unsigned long)sp;
 	dump_mem("Stack: ", KERN_DEFAULT, stack, THREAD_SIZE +
 		 (unsigned long)task_stack_page(tsk));
-	show_trace(tsk, sp, NULL);
+	show_trace(tsk, sp, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
 }
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c
index a094633874c3..456cc8d171f7 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
 	printk("MACH: %08lx MACL: %08lx GBR : %08lx PR  : %08lx\n",
 	       regs->mach, regs->macl, regs->gbr, regs->pr);
 
-	show_trace(NULL, (unsigned long *)regs->regs[15], regs);
+	show_trace(NULL, (unsigned long *)regs->regs[15], regs, KERN_DEFAULT);
 	show_code(regs);
 }
 
-- 
2.26.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ