[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200418201944.482088-37-dima@arista.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 21:19:30 +0100
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 36/50] um: Add show_stack_loglvl()
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
index c831a1c2eb94..1b54b6431499 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
@@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
- pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
+ const char *loglvl = data;
+
+ printk("%s [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", loglvl, address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
(void *)address);
}
@@ -25,7 +27,8 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops stackops = {
.address = _print_addr
};
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
+ const char *loglvl)
{
struct pt_regs *segv_regs = current->thread.segv_regs;
int i;
@@ -39,17 +42,22 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
if (!stack)
stack = get_stack_pointer(task, segv_regs);
- pr_info("Stack:\n");
+ printk("%sStack:\n", loglvl);
for (i = 0; i < 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE; i++) {
if (kstack_end(stack))
break;
if (i && ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0))
- pr_cont("\n");
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
pr_cont(" %08lx", *stack++);
}
- pr_cont("\n");
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
+
+ printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
+ dump_trace(current, &stackops, (void *)loglvl);
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
+}
- pr_info("Call Trace:\n");
- dump_trace(current, &stackops, NULL);
- pr_info("\n");
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
+{
+ show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_INFO);
}
--
2.26.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists