[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea3d9b35-4409-fb86-8855-0ddb73989829@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 22:55:00 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/PCI: Fix a memory leak in an error handling path
Le 18/04/2020 à 22:00, Markus Elfring a écrit :
>> If 'ioremap' fails, we must free 'bridge', as done in other error handling
>> path bellow.
> I suggest to improve this change description.
I suggest you stop proposing over and over useless comments.
Please just ignore my proposals as I do for your boring, never
constructing, replies.
> * Please avoid a typo.
>
> * Is an imperative wording preferred?
>
* is Melissa still around?
> …
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/pci.c
>> @@ -216,8 +216,10 @@ static int __init mcf_pci_init(void)
> …
>
> I propose to move the pci_free_host_bridge() call for the desired
I propose to let patch submitter and maintainer decide about it.
I don't need your point of view. I guess that maintainers don't either.
No need to waste time trying to engage any discussion with me.
This is the first and very last exchange we will ever have.
Best regards,
CJ
> exception handling to the end of this function implementation.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=c0d73a868d9b411bd2d0c8e5ff9d98bfa8563cb1#n450
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists