linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] drm/i915: remove redundant assignment to variable test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <158719242529.2062.10865538071297156214@build.alporthouse.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Apr 2020 07:47:05 +0100
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/i915: remove redundant assignment to variable test_result

Quoting Colin King (2020-04-17 17:08:29)
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The variable test_result is being initialized with a value that is
> never read and it is being updated later with a new value.  The
> initialization is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index d4fcc9583869..55697c5e251a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -5567,7 +5567,7 @@ void intel_dp_process_phy_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  static u8 intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> -       u8 test_result = DP_TEST_NAK;
> +       u8 test_result;
>  
>         test_result = intel_dp_prepare_phytest(intel_dp);

Yes, this is definitely being overwritten this time :)
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris