linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Reduce a lock scope in amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af0aa64e-f097-76a7-1c7b-5bdf0ad55a31@web.de>
Date:   Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:05:07 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@....com>,
        Felix Kühling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
Cc:     kernel@...o.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Reduce a lock scope in
 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu()

> Maybe we could reduce the mutex_lock(&mem->lock)`s protected code area,
> and noneed to protect pr_debug.

I suggest to improve the commit message.
Would you like to adjust the patch subject?

Do you imagine that data synchronisation should evolve in other ways?

Regards,
Markus