linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6656: Fix functions' documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42190e0e-4167-3cd6-0e52-d240ae67a502@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:22:50 +0100
From:   Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>
To:     Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
Cc:     Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Quentin Deslandes <quentin.deslandes@...ev.co.uk>,
        Amir Mahdi Ghorbanian <indigoomega021@...il.com>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        "John B. Wyatt IV" <jbwyatt4@...il.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6656: Fix functions' documentation



On 19/04/2020 08:47, Oscar Carter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:05:53PM +0100, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
>> Actually I don't really think the function descriptions are needed at all the
>> names of the functions are enough.
>>
> Then, it would be better leave the documentation as it was before or remove it?
> 

I would remove them all except for comments inside functions.

Regards

Malcolm