[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34fe524d-f9f0-ba8a-d5cb-ffbeacf1b5d8@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:32:08 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Zzy Wysm <zzy@...wysm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] nfsd: fix empty-body warning in nfs4state.c
Hello!
On 18.04.2020 21:41, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix gcc empty-body warning when -Wextra is used:
>
> ../fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:3898:3: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘else’ statement [-Wempty-body]
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20200417.orig/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ linux-next-20200417/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
[...]
> @@ -3895,7 +3896,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
> copy_clid(new, conf);
> gen_confirm(new, nn);
> } else /* case 4 (new client) or cases 2, 3 (client reboot): */
> - ;
> + do_empty();
In this case explicit {} would probably have been better, as described in
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst, clause (3).
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists