linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200419151527.GT17661@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:15:27 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Ethon Paul <ethp@...com>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized"

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:46:47PM +0800, Ethon Paul wrote:
> There is a typo in comment, fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@...com>

Good eyes!!!  Queued, thank you!

I did edit the commit log as shown below.  Please let me know if I messed
anything up.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 496c9c0dc7b259ee93ea91789a20e09421e840c1
Author: Ethon Paul <ethp@...com>
Date:   Sat Apr 18 19:46:47 2020 +0800

    srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized"
    
    This commit fixes a typo in a comment.
    
    Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@...com>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 6d3ef70..8ff71e5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
  * it, if this function was preempted for enough time for the counters
  * to wrap, it really doesn't matter whether or not we expedite the grace
  * period.  The extra overhead of a needlessly expedited grace period is
- * negligible when amoritized over that time period, and the extra latency
+ * negligible when amortized over that time period, and the extra latency
  * of a needlessly non-expedited grace period is similarly negligible.
  */
 static bool srcu_might_be_idle(struct srcu_struct *ssp)