linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/10] clk: mmp: frac: Do not lose last 4 digits of precision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200419172742.674717-2-lkundrak@v3.sk>
Date:   Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:27:33 +0200
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] clk: mmp: frac: Do not lose last 4 digits of precision

While calculating the output rate of a fractional divider clock, the
value is divided and multipled by 10000, discarding the least
significant digits -- presumably to fit the intermediate value within 32
bits.

The precision we're losing is, however, not insignificant for things like
I2S clock. Maybe also elsewhere, now that since commit ea56ad60260e ("clk:
mmp2: Stop pretending PLL outputs are constant") the parent rates are more
precise and no longer rounded to 10000s.

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
---
 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c b/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c
index fabc09aca6c46..ed9928f5bdc7f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c
@@ -28,13 +28,15 @@ static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
 		unsigned long *prate)
 {
 	struct mmp_clk_factor *factor = to_clk_factor(hw);
-	unsigned long rate = 0, prev_rate;
+	u64 rate = 0, prev_rate;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < factor->ftbl_cnt; i++) {
 		prev_rate = rate;
-		rate = (((*prate / 10000) * factor->ftbl[i].den) /
-			(factor->ftbl[i].num * factor->masks->factor)) * 10000;
+		rate = *prate;
+		rate *= factor->ftbl[i].den;
+		do_div(rate, factor->ftbl[i].num * factor->masks->factor);
+
 		if (rate > drate)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -54,6 +56,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	struct mmp_clk_factor *factor = to_clk_factor(hw);
 	struct mmp_clk_factor_masks *masks = factor->masks;
 	unsigned int val, num, den;
+	u64 rate;
 
 	val = readl_relaxed(factor->base);
 
@@ -66,8 +69,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	if (!den)
 		return 0;
 
-	return (((parent_rate / 10000)  * den) /
-			(num * factor->masks->factor)) * 10000;
+	rate = parent_rate;
+	rate *= den;
+	do_div(rate, num * factor->masks->factor);
+
+	return rate;
 }
 
 /* Configures new clock rate*/
@@ -78,12 +84,14 @@ static int clk_factor_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
 	struct mmp_clk_factor_masks *masks = factor->masks;
 	int i;
 	unsigned long val;
-	unsigned long rate = 0;
 	unsigned long flags = 0;
+	u64 rate = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < factor->ftbl_cnt; i++) {
-		rate = (((prate / 10000) * factor->ftbl[i].den) /
-			(factor->ftbl[i].num * factor->masks->factor)) * 10000;
+		rate = prate;
+		rate *= factor->ftbl[i].den;
+		do_div(rate, factor->ftbl[i].num * factor->masks->factor);
+
 		if (rate > drate)
 			break;
 	}
-- 
2.26.0