[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200419040944.GB166864@dtor-ws>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 21:09:44 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Julian Squires <julian@...ht.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+7bf5a7b0f0a1f9446f4c@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, andreyknvl@...gle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ingrassia@...genesys.com,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in usbhid_close (3)
Hi Alan,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:16:32PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> linux-input people:
>
> syzbot has found a bug related to USB/HID/input, and I have narrowed it
> down to the wacom driver. As far as I can tell, the problem is caused
> the fact that drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c calls input_register_device()
> in several places, but it never calls input_unregister_device().
>
> I know very little about the input subsystem, but this certainly seems
> like a bug.
Wacom driver uses devm_input_allocate_device(), so unregister should
happen automatically on device removal once we exit wacom_probe().
>
> When the device is unplugged, the disconnect pathway doesn't call
> hid_hw_close(). That routine doesn't get called until the user closes
> the device file (which can be long after the device is gone and
> hid_hw_stop() has run). Then usbhid_close() gets a use-after-free
> error when it tries to access data structures that were deallocated by
> usbhid_stop(). No doubt there are other problems too, but this is
> the one that syzbot found.
Unregistering the input device should result in calling wacom_close()
(if device was previously opened), which, as far as I can tell, calls
hid_hw_close().
I wonder if it is valid to call hid_hw_stop() before hid_hw_close()?
It could be that we again get confused by the "easiness" of devm APIs
and completely screwing up unwind order.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists