[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200420150235.GA3159@ubuntu>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:02:35 +0200
From: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>,
Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
"John B . Wyatt IV" <jbwyatt4@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Use fls instead of for loop in
vnt_update_top_rates
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:10:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote:
> > - for (i = RATE_11M;; i--) {
> > - if (priv->basic_rates & (u16)(1 << i)) {
> > - top_cck = i;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - if (i == RATE_1M)
> > - break;
> > - }
> > + pos = fls(priv->basic_rates & GENMASK(RATE_54M, RATE_6M));
> > + priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate = pos ? pos-- : RATE_24M;
> ^^^^^
> Argh... Come on. I don't want to have to break out the C standard to
> see if this is defined behavior and where the sequence points are. A
> pre-op would be clear but the most clear thing is to write it like this:
>
> priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate = pos ? (pos - 1) : RATE_24M;
>
Ok, I do the modification as you suggested and resend a new version.
>
> >
> > - priv->top_cck_basic_rate = top_cck;
> > + pos = fls(priv->basic_rates & GENMASK(RATE_11M, RATE_1M));
> > + priv->top_cck_basic_rate = pos ? pos-- : RATE_1M;
> ^^^^^
> Same.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
thanks,
oscar carter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists