linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Function Granular Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202004201046.600183D@keescook>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:48:01 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        arjan@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        rick.p.edgecomb@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Function Granular Kernel Address Space Layout
 Randomization

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 02:04:42PM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> Kristen Carlson Accardi (8):
>   objtool: do not assume order of parent/child functions
>   x86: tools/relocs: Support >64K section headers

Can these two patches land separately (i.e. "now")? CFI will need the
relocs fix too, so better to have this landed upstream for both
features. I see Josh's Ack in the first...

-- 
Kees Cook