linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/CPU: Add native CPUID variants returning a single datum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:07:32 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Evalds Iodzevics <evalds.iodzevics@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/CPU: Add native CPUID variants returning a
 single datum

A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 08:52:53AM +0300, Evalds Iodzevics wrote:
> The second patch depends on this commit by Borislav so i included
> this, probably I should have just mentioned it in my comment?

I really do not understand this sentence at all.  I have no context as
to what you are trying to do.

greg k-h