[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200420193310.GF5820@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:33:10 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] mmap locking API: convert nested write lock
sites
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:43:49PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> @@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *old, struct mm_struct *new)
> * when the new ->mm is used for the first time.
> */
> __switch_mm(&new->context.id);
> - down_write_nested(&new->mmap_sem, 1);
> + mmap_write_lock_nested(new, 1);
This should have already been using SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING. 1 is
uninformative.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists