[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200420205641.6sgsllj6pmsnwrvp@linux-p48b>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:56:41 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>, peterz@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
joel@...lfernandes.org, will@...nel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: Replace vcpu->swait with rcuwait
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>This looks like a change in the semantics of the tracepoint. Before this
>change, 'waited' would have been true if the vcpu waited at all. Here,
>you'd
>have false if it has been interrupted by a signal, even if the vcpu
>has waited
>for a period of time.
Hmm but sleeps are now uninterruptible as we're using TASK_IDLE.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists