[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D1A77603-11FB-407F-B480-82C57E742C51@goldelico.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:11:18 +0200
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
"Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] w1: omap-hdq: Simplify driver with PM runtime autosuspend
Hi Tony,
> Am 20.04.2020 um 17:08 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>:
>
> * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [200417 21:04]:
>> To me it looks as if reading hqd too quickly after omap_hdq_runtime_resume()
>> may be part of the problem, although it is 0.4 seconds between [ 18.355163]
>> and [ 18.745269]. So I am not sure about my interpretation.
>>
>> A different attempt for interpretation may be that trying to read the
>> slave triggers omap_hdq_runtime_resume() just before doing the
>> first hdq_read_byte().
>
> Hmm so I wonder if adding msleep(100) at the end of
> omap_hdq_runtime_resume() might help?
I have tried and initially it did boot and work once.
But after the second boot/reboot the effect was back.
This is something I have observed previously, that the issue
is there in ca. 9 or 10 boot attempts. So I would assume
some race condition with udev reading the uevent file of the
bq27xxx bus client and hence through hdq.
I already had noticed some hqd_read activity right after probing
success.
I had also tried to change pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(, 1000)
with no success. And I tried to call omap_hdq_runtime_resume() at the
end of probe.
The only maybe important observation was when I disabled all
kernel modules except *hdq*.ko and *bq27*.ko. Then I did only
get an emergency shell so that it is quite similar to the
scenario Andreas has tested. With this setup it did work.
I then tried to reenable other kernel modules but the result
wasn't convincing that it gives a reliable result.
So I have still no clear indication when the problem occurs and
when not.
BR and thanks,
Nikolaus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists