[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200420152729.40cb10e1@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:27:29 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/33] docs: update recommended Sphinx version to
2.4.4
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:48:30 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> The Sphinx check script is already smart enough to keep
> working, with older versions, warning the users that
> an upgrade is recommended (and explaining how):
>
> Sphinx version 1.7.9
> Warning: It is recommended at least Sphinx version 2.4.4.
> Detected OS: Fedora release 31 (Thirty One).
>
> To upgrade Sphinx, use:
>
> /usr/bin/virtualenv sphinx_2.4.4
> . sphinx_2.4.4/bin/activate
> pip install -r ./Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
Sigh...that version is all of a month and some old. I hate to be pushing
people that hard on the upgrade treadmill.
I'm still looking over the set, and will probably apply this, but I think
we should consider tweaking this before 5.8:
- Can we make the warning more explicit that 2.4.4 is needed *if you are
generating PDF*? Most people, I think, don't do that, and can live
happily with an older version.
- Perhaps the time has come to raise the lower bound to, say, 1.7? That
might let us get rid of a bit of cruft.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists