[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200420073434.GE27314@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:34:34 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: fix watchdog soft lockups during
set_zone_contiguous()
On Fri 17-04-20 15:12:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:34:17 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Without CONFIG_PREEMPT, it can happen that we get soft lockups detected,
> > e.g., while booting up.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1607,6 +1607,7 @@ void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone)
> > if (!__pageblock_pfn_to_page(block_start_pfn,
> > block_end_pfn, zone))
> > return;
> > + cond_resched();
> > }
> >
> > /* We confirm that there is no hole */
>
> I added cc:stable to this one. Please let me know if that wasn't a
> good idea.
Really large memory setups tend to run on distribution kernels so
backporting to old kernels doesn't really harm.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists