linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] dm raid/raid1: enable discard support when any devices support discard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6bbf9d94-2fbb-f96f-ea85-a480ba109c55@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:35:38 +0200
From:   Ondrej Kozina <okozina@...hat.com>
To:     dm-devel@...hat.com
Cc:     Paul Wise <pabs3@...edaddy.net>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] dm raid/raid1: enable discard support when
 any devices support discard

On 4/19/20 4:48 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-04-19 at 09:19 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> 
>> You went overboard with implementation before checking to see if your
>> work would be well received.  Your 2/3 patch header shows you're
>> capable of analyzing past commits to explain the evolution of code,
>> etc.  But yet you make no mention of this commit header which explicitly
>> speaks to why what you're proposing is _not_ acceptable:
>>
>> commit 8a74d29d541cd86569139c6f3f44b2d210458071
>> Author: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
>> Date:   Tue Nov 14 15:40:52 2017 -0500
>>
>>      dm: discard support requires all targets in a table support discards
> 
> I do remember seeing this commit while working on this, I guess I
> ignored it in my attempts to get fstrim working on my rootfs, woops.
> 
>> I haven't looked closely at MD raid in this area but if you trully think
>> underlying MD raid can cope with issuing discards to devices that don't
>> support them (or that it avoids issuing them?) then please update
>> dm-raid.c to conditionally set ti->discard_supported (if not all devices
>> support discard).  That is how to inform DM core that the target knows
>> better and it will manage discards issued to it.  It keeps the change
>> local to dm-raid.c without the flag-day you're proposing.
> 
> On my system I have a HDD and an SSD, with /boot on MD RAID and / on
> ext4 on DM RAID on 2 DM crypt volumes. In this setup fstrim works on
> /boot but does not work on / and with my patches it works on / again.
> In addition I don't see any messages in dmesg or other issues when
> doing fstrim / with my patches.

Did you have discard allowed on both dm-crypt devices? dm-crypt (kernel) 
does not allow discards by default.

Regards O.