linux-kernel - Re: [patch 02/15] x86/cpu: Uninline CR4 accessors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200420090102.GB24518@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:01:02 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/15] x86/cpu: Uninline CR4 accessors

> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,30 @@ void native_write_cr4(unsigned long val)
>  			  bits_missing);
>  	}
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(native_write_cr4);
> +#if IS_MODULE(CONFIG_LKDTM)
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(native_write_cr4);
> +#endif

While this is better than what we had before we really need to have
a discussion on lkdtm - it needs a lot of crap that otherwise wouldn't
be exported, and I'm really worried about people enabling it and thus
adding exports even if they are conditional.  Can we force the code
to be built in require a boot option for it to be activated?