lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegtk=pbLgBzM92tRq8UMUh+vxcDcwLL77iAcv=Mxw3r4Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:10 +0200
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:     Chakra Divi <chakragithub@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse:rely on fuse_perm for exec when no mode bits set

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 11:31 AM Chakra Divi <chakragithub@...il.com> wrote:
>
> In current code, for exec we are checking mode bits
> for x bit set even though the fuse_perm_getattr returns
> success. Changes in this patch avoids mode bit explicit
> check, leaves the exec checking to fuse file system
> in uspace.

Why is this needed?

Thanks,
Miklos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ