linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.5 46/65] keys: Fix proc_keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200420121516.763243061@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:38:50 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.5 46/65] keys: Fix proc_keys_next to increase position index

From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>

commit 86d32f9a7c54ad74f4514d7fef7c847883207291 upstream.

If seq_file .next function does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output:

    $ dd if=/proc/keys bs=1  # full usual output
    0f6bfdf5 I--Q---     2 perm 3f010000  1000  1000 user      4af2f79ab8848d0a: 740
    1fb91b32 I--Q---     3 perm 1f3f0000  1000 65534 keyring   _uid.1000: 2
    27589480 I--Q---     1 perm 0b0b0000     0     0 user      invocation_id: 16
    2f33ab67 I--Q---   152 perm 3f030000     0     0 keyring   _ses: 2
    33f1d8fa I--Q---     4 perm 3f030000  1000  1000 keyring   _ses: 1
    3d427fda I--Q---     2 perm 3f010000  1000  1000 user      69ec44aec7678e5a: 740
    3ead4096 I--Q---     1 perm 1f3f0000  1000 65534 keyring   _uid_ses.1000: 1
    521+0 records in
    521+0 records out
    521 bytes copied, 0,00123769 s, 421 kB/s

But a read after lseek in middle of last line results in the partial
last line and then a repeat of the final line:

    $ dd if=/proc/keys bs=500 skip=1
    dd: /proc/keys: cannot skip to specified offset
    g   _uid_ses.1000: 1
    3ead4096 I--Q---     1 perm 1f3f0000  1000 65534 keyring   _uid_ses.1000: 1
    0+1 records in
    0+1 records out
    97 bytes copied, 0,000135035 s, 718 kB/s

and a read after lseek beyond end of file results in the last line being
shown:

    $ dd if=/proc/keys bs=1000 skip=1   # read after lseek beyond end of file
    dd: /proc/keys: cannot skip to specified offset
    3ead4096 I--Q---     1 perm 1f3f0000  1000 65534 keyring   _uid_ses.1000: 1
    0+1 records in
    0+1 records out
    76 bytes copied, 0,000119981 s, 633 kB/s

See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283

Fixes: 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code ...")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 security/keys/proc.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/security/keys/proc.c
+++ b/security/keys/proc.c
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ static void *proc_keys_next(struct seq_f
 	n = key_serial_next(p, v);
 	if (n)
 		*_pos = key_node_serial(n);
+	else
+		(*_pos)++;
 	return n;
 }