linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 23/60] acpi/nfit: improve bounds checking for func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200420121508.158062718@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:39:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 23/60] acpi/nfit: improve bounds checking for func

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

commit 01091c496f920e634ea84b689f480c39016752a8 upstream.

The 'func' variable can come from the user in the __nd_ioctl().  If it's
too high then the (1 << func) shift in acpi_nfit_clear_to_send() is
undefined.  In acpi_nfit_ctl() we pass 'func' to test_bit(func, &dsm_mask)
which could result in an out of bounds access.

To fix these issues, I introduced the NVDIMM_CMD_MAX (31) define and
updated nfit_dsm_revid() to use that define as well instead of magic
numbers.

Fixes: 11189c1089da ("acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225161927.hvftuq7kjn547fyj@kili.mountain
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c |   10 ++++++----
 drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static union acpi_object *acpi_label_inf
 
 static u8 nfit_dsm_revid(unsigned family, unsigned func)
 {
-	static const u8 revid_table[NVDIMM_FAMILY_MAX+1][32] = {
+	static const u8 revid_table[NVDIMM_FAMILY_MAX+1][NVDIMM_CMD_MAX+1] = {
 		[NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL] = {
 			[NVDIMM_INTEL_GET_MODES] = 2,
 			[NVDIMM_INTEL_GET_FWINFO] = 2,
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static u8 nfit_dsm_revid(unsigned family
 
 	if (family > NVDIMM_FAMILY_MAX)
 		return 0;
-	if (func > 31)
+	if (func > NVDIMM_CMD_MAX)
 		return 0;
 	id = revid_table[family][func];
 	if (id == 0)
@@ -492,7 +492,8 @@ int acpi_nfit_ctl(struct nvdimm_bus_desc
 	 * Check for a valid command.  For ND_CMD_CALL, we also have to
 	 * make sure that the DSM function is supported.
 	 */
-	if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL && !test_bit(func, &dsm_mask))
+	if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL &&
+	    (func > NVDIMM_CMD_MAX || !test_bit(func, &dsm_mask)))
 		return -ENOTTY;
 	else if (!test_bit(cmd, &cmd_mask))
 		return -ENOTTY;
@@ -3499,7 +3500,8 @@ static int acpi_nfit_clear_to_send(struc
 	if (nvdimm && cmd == ND_CMD_CALL &&
 			call_pkg->nd_family == NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL) {
 		func = call_pkg->nd_command;
-		if ((1 << func) & NVDIMM_INTEL_SECURITY_CMDMASK)
+		if (func > NVDIMM_CMD_MAX ||
+		    (1 << func) & NVDIMM_INTEL_SECURITY_CMDMASK)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 		| ACPI_NFIT_MEM_NOT_ARMED | ACPI_NFIT_MEM_MAP_FAILED)
 
 #define NVDIMM_FAMILY_MAX NVDIMM_FAMILY_HYPERV
+#define NVDIMM_CMD_MAX 31
 
 #define NVDIMM_STANDARD_CMDMASK \
 (1 << ND_CMD_SMART | 1 << ND_CMD_SMART_THRESHOLD | 1 << ND_CMD_DIMM_FLAGS \