lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:47:52 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, hpa@...or.com, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, rick.p.edgecomb@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] module: Reorder functions On 4/20/2020 6:43 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Note that arm64 does not have a decompressor, so there the fine > grained randomization of the core kernel is not really feasible using > the approach presented here. maybe do a "memcpy" decompressor as an option? :-) >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists