linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] module: Reorder functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <578416ef-3d1d-4b64-2be7-0ae1f5b84796@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:47:52 -0700
From:   Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        hpa@...or.com, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, rick.p.edgecomb@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] module: Reorder functions

On 4/20/2020 6:43 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> 
> Note that arm64 does not have a decompressor, so there the fine
> grained randomization of the core kernel is not really feasible using
> the approach presented here.

maybe do a "memcpy" decompressor as an option? :-)

>