linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Enhance TEE kernel client interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:52:17 +0200
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jerome Forissier <jerome@...issier.org>,
        Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Enhance TEE kernel client interface

Hi Sumit,

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:45 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 11:00, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Earlier this patch-set was part of TEE Trusted keys patch-set [1]. But
> > since these are completely independent enhancements for TEE kernel
> > client interface which can be merged separately while TEE Trusted keys
> > discussions are ongoing.
> >
> > Patch #1 enables support for registered kernel shared memory with TEE.
> >
> > Patch #2 enables support for private kernel login method required for
> > cases like trusted keys where we don't wan't user-space to directly
> > access TEE service.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/430
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Reserve only half of GP implementation defined range for kernel space.
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Misc. renaming of variables.
> >
> > Sumit Garg (2):
> >   tee: enable support to register kernel memory
> >   tee: add private login method for kernel clients
> >
>
> In case we don't have any further comments, would you like to pick up these?

Thanks for the reminder. I'm picking this up.

Jerome, it's not too late to provide a tag if you like.

Cheers,
Jens