linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf.c: allocate initialized memory in fill_thread_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7ca60940bead472909ebfd65804e268bc986402.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:26:33 -0700
From:   Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sunhaoyl@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf.c: allocate initialized memory in
 fill_thread_core_info()

On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 18:16 +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:05 PM Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 17:09 +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > +x86 folks
> > > 
> > > (rest of thread is on lore
> > > <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200419100848.63472-1-glider@google.com/>;;,
> > > with original bug report on github
> > > <https://github.com/google/kmsan/issues/76>;;)
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:54 PM Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:42 AM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:41:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:33:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:08:48 +0200 glider@...gle.com wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > KMSAN reported uninitialized data being written to disk when dumping
> > > > > > > > core. As a result, several kilobytes of kmalloc memory may be written to
> > > > > > > > the core file and then read by a non-privileged user.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Ewww. That's been there for 12 years. Did something change in
> > > > > > regset_size() or regset->get()? Do you know what leaves the hole?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Not lately and I would also like to hear the details; which regset it is?
> > > > > Should be reasonably easy to find - just memset() the damn thing to something
> > > > > recognizable, do whatever triggers that KMSAN report and look at that
> > > > > resulting coredump.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Seems to be REGSET_XSTATE filled by xstateregs_get().
> > > > Is there a ptrace interface also using that function?
> > > 
> > > It looks to me like the problem KMSAN found is that
> > > copy_xstate_to_kernel() will not fill out memory for unused xstates? I
> > > think this may have been introduced by commit 91c3dba7dbc1
> > > ("x86/fpu/xstate: Fix PTRACE frames for XSAVES", introduced in v4.8).
> > > 
> > > There seem to be no other functions that reach that path other than
> > > coredumping; I think the correct fix would be to change
> > > copy_xstate_to_kernel() to always fully initialize the output buffer.
> > 
> > Yes, that makes sense.  On the other hand, the kzalloc() fix prevents potential
> > similar problems for other regsets.
> 
> I don't really have anything against using kzalloc() there; but in my
> opinion that's not a fix, that's hardening. The real problem, in my
> opinion, is that regset->get() claims to have filled out a buffer
> without actually having done so; and if someone happens to add another
> caller to that thing in the future, I don't want them to run into
> exactly the same problem again.

Agree!