[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e3094aef0253df8d0599735894ad5bfa08eff25e.1587487612.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:54:28 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 17/29] docs: filesystems: convert mandatory-locking.txt to ReST
- Add a SPDX header;
- Adjust document title;
- Some whitespace fixes and new line breaks;
- Use notes markups;
- Add it to filesystems/index.rst.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/filesystems/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/filesystems/locks.rst | 2 +-
...tory-locking.txt => mandatory-locking.rst} | 25 ++++++++++++-------
fs/locks.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/filesystems/{mandatory-locking.txt => mandatory-locking.rst} (91%)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
index 96190e268c11..02d52b536baf 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ algorithms work.
fiemap
files
locks
+ mandatory-locking
automount-support
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locks.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locks.rst
index 10f67fb9ce07..c5ae858b1aac 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/locks.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locks.rst
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ fcntl(), with all the problems that implies.
---------------------------------------
Mandatory locking, as described in
-'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.txt' was prior to this release a
+'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst' was prior to this release a
general configuration option that was valid for all mounted filesystems. This
had a number of inherent dangers, not the least of which was the ability to
freeze an NFS server by asking it to read a file for which a mandatory lock
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst
similarity index 91%
rename from Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.txt
rename to Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst
index a251ca33164a..9ce73544a8f0 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
- Mandatory File Locking For The Linux Operating System
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=====================================================
+Mandatory File Locking For The Linux Operating System
+=====================================================
Andy Walker <andy@...aker.kvaerner.no>
15 April 1996
+
(Updated September 2007)
0. Why you should avoid mandatory locking
@@ -53,15 +58,17 @@ possible on existing user code. The scheme is based on marking individual files
as candidates for mandatory locking, and using the existing fcntl()/lockf()
interface for applying locks just as if they were normal, advisory locks.
-Note 1: In saying "file" in the paragraphs above I am actually not telling
-the whole truth. System V locking is based on fcntl(). The granularity of
-fcntl() is such that it allows the locking of byte ranges in files, in addition
-to entire files, so the mandatory locking rules also have byte level
-granularity.
+.. Note::
-Note 2: POSIX.1 does not specify any scheme for mandatory locking, despite
-borrowing the fcntl() locking scheme from System V. The mandatory locking
-scheme is defined by the System V Interface Definition (SVID) Version 3.
+ 1. In saying "file" in the paragraphs above I am actually not telling
+ the whole truth. System V locking is based on fcntl(). The granularity of
+ fcntl() is such that it allows the locking of byte ranges in files, in
+ addition to entire files, so the mandatory locking rules also have byte
+ level granularity.
+
+ 2. POSIX.1 does not specify any scheme for mandatory locking, despite
+ borrowing the fcntl() locking scheme from System V. The mandatory locking
+ scheme is defined by the System V Interface Definition (SVID) Version 3.
2. Marking a file for mandatory locking
---------------------------------------
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index b8a31c1c4fff..1d4f4d5da704 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
*
* Initial implementation of mandatory locks. SunOS turned out to be
* a rotten model, so I implemented the "obvious" semantics.
- * See 'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.txt' for details.
+ * See 'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst' for details.
* Andy Walker (andy@...aker.kvaerner.no), April 06, 1996.
*
* Don't allow mandatory locks on mmap()'ed files. Added simple functions to
--
2.25.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists