linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, x32: Fix invalid instruction in BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200421171552.28393-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:15:51 -0700
From:   Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
        Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, x32: Fix invalid instruction in BPF_LDX zero-extension

The current JIT uses the following sequence to zero-extend into the
upper 32 bits of the destination register for BPF_LDX BPF_{B,H,W},
when the destination register is not on the stack:

  EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0);

However, this is not a valid instruction on x86.

This patch fixes the problem by instead emitting "xor dst_hi,dst_hi"
to clear the upper 32 bits.

This bug may not be currently triggerable as BPF_REG_AX is the only
register not stored on the stack and the verifier uses it in a limited
way, and the verifier implements a zero-extension optimization. But the
JIT should avoid emitting invalid instructions regardless.

Fixes: 03f5781be2c7b ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32")
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 4d2a7a764602..cc9ad3892ea6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1854,7 +1854,9 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
 					      STACK_VAR(dst_hi));
 					EMIT(0x0, 4);
 				} else {
-					EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0);
+					/* xor dst_hi,dst_hi */
+					EMIT2(0x33,
+					      add_2reg(0xC0, dst_hi, dst_hi));
 				}
 				break;
 			case BPF_DW:
-- 
2.17.1