lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:25:01 -0700
From:   Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] objtool: use sh_info to find the base for .rela sections

ELF doesn't require .rela section names to match the base section. Use
the section index in sh_info to find the section instead of looking it
up by name.

LLD, for example, generates a .rela section that doesn't match the base
section name when we merge sections in a linker script for a binary
compiled with -ffunction-sections.

Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
---
 tools/objtool/elf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/elf.c b/tools/objtool/elf.c
index 09ddc8f1def3..73cfe45975c8 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/elf.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/elf.c
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int read_relas(struct elf *elf)
 		if (sec->sh.sh_type != SHT_RELA)
 			continue;
 
-		sec->base = find_section_by_name(elf, sec->name + 5);
+		sec->base = find_section_by_index(elf, sec->sh.sh_info);
 		if (!sec->base) {
 			WARN("can't find base section for rela section %s",
 			     sec->name);

base-commit: ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936
-- 
2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ