linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:01:48 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:49:41PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >  	spin_lock(&ctx->csa.register_lock);
> > -	ret = __spufs_proxydma_info_read(ctx, buf, len, pos);
> > +	__spufs_proxydma_info_read(ctx, &info);
> > +	ret = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, len, pos, &info, sizeof(info));
> 
> IDGI...  What's that access_ok() for?  If you are using simple_read_from_buffer(),
> the damn thing goes through copy_to_user().  Why bother with separate access_ok()
> here?

I have no idea at all, this just refactors the code.