[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200420201527.679247f6fa76cba4331f3cd3@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:15:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] rcu: rename kfree_call_rcu()/__kfree_rcu()
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 20:01:44 +0100 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:25:41AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:18:39PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > > Rename kfree_call_rcu() to the kvfree_call_rcu().
> > > The reason is, it is capable of freeing vmalloc()
> > > memory now.
> > >
> > > Do the same with __kfree_rcu() macro, it becomes
> > > __kvfree_rcu(), the reason is the same as pointed
> > > above.
> >
> > Vlad, this patch does not apply to my branch that I shared with you. Sorry if
> > I was not clear earlier, could we work on the same branch to avoid conflicts?
> >
> It was clear to me. Basically i knew that you would be able to apply it
> because of slim changes. I based my work on latest Paul's branch simply
> because that my current setup was based on that, it would take more time
> to switch.
>
> Next changes i will base on your branch.
>
> > I based the kfree_rcu shrinker patches on an 'rcu/kfree' branch in my git
> > tree: https://github.com/joelagnel/linux-kernel/tree/rcu/kfree
> >
> > For now I manually applied 5/6. All others applied cleanly.
> >
> > Updated the tree as I continue to review your patches.
> >
I'm not sure what's happening here - these patches aren't yet in
linux-next.
A couple of thoughts:
- Please cc linux-mm@...ck.org on this patchset and anything else
which impacts MM.
- It's a bit strange to create new infrastructure which has but a
single call site. Please tell us much more about "there was also
request/interest so there will be new comers" to set minds at ease.
Who/where are these possible new callsites and when can we expect to
see that code?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists