[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07351901-a533-0319-b2fd-f49f6540c238@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:07:54 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>,
Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy
for a long time
21.04.2020 18:34, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 21/04/2020 16:18, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 21.04.2020 17:40, Jon Hunter пишет:
>>>
>>> On 21/04/2020 14:25, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 21.04.2020 12:49, Jon Hunter пишет:
>>>> ...
>>>>> I can try the above, but I agree it would be best to avoid messing with
>>>>> the suspend levels if possible.
>>>>
>>>> Will be awesome if you could try it and report back the result.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I gave it a try but suspend still fails.
>>
>> Is this regulator error gone with my changes?
>>
>> [ 60.450346] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 653 at
>> /home/jonathanh/workdir/tegra/mlt-linux_next/kernel/drivers/regulator/core.c:2603
>> _regulator_disable+0xb8/0x1b4
>> [ 60.463959] unbalanced disables for vdd_pexa,vdd_pexb
>
> The above is still there with your changes.
Interesting, hopefully the PM logs will point out the source of the problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists