[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200421191754.3372370-2-ira.weiny@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:43 -0700
From: ira.weiny@...el.com
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V9 01/11] fs/xfs: Remove unnecessary initialization of i_rwsem
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
An earlier call of xfs_reinit_inode() from xfs_iget_cache_hit() already
handles initialization of i_rwsem.
Doing so again is unneeded.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
---
Changes from V4:
Update commit message to make it clear the xfs_iget_cache_hit()
is actually doing the initialization via xfs_reinit_inode()
New for V4:
NOTE: This was found while ensuring the new i_aops_sem was properly
handled. It seems like this is a layering violation so I think it is
worth cleaning up so as to not confuse others.
---
fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 8bf1d15be3f6..17a0b86fe701 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
+ ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&inode->i_rwsem));
error = xfs_reinit_inode(mp, inode);
if (error) {
bool wake;
@@ -456,9 +457,6 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
ip->i_sick = 0;
ip->i_checked = 0;
- ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&inode->i_rwsem));
- init_rwsem(&inode->i_rwsem);
-
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
} else {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists